Closeup of two pencils and their erasers

Goodbye and hello • Part 5

Failing to plan

published:  September 9, 2020
 

Image: Jeff Weese; Pixabay

Just when I thought the site’s “lurch”1 among hosts was over with last week’s landing at Render, I tripped on a banana peel whose presence in my path was entirely my own fault.

When I drew up the requirements I mentioned in Part 1 for the site’s host, I thought I’d covered all the use cases to which I’d become accustomed in the nearly two years of this site’s existence.

<Harsh buzzer noise> Wrong. Go to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect two hundred dollars. (That’s what I’m telling myself, you understand.)

Turns out there was one thing I’d forgotten, perhaps because it had been so long since I’d last needed to do it.

Keep in mind that this site, like so many others built on the Jamstack, is auto-generated every time changes are pushed to the online repository where it lives. Well, sometimes, you may want to change which repository is “watched” so you can make some really major change to the site without having to shut it down—thus forcing the sometimes sluggish regeneration of the site’s SSL certificate—and rebuild it.

I’ve done it before, and, trust me, I know I’ll need to do it again.

And that was the scenario I forgot when evaluating the hosts I considered, which, again, were (in alphabetical order): Firebase, Netlify, the aforementioned Render, and Vercel. With Firebase, you have to set it up yourself, but it’s doable. With Netlify and Vercel, you simply point the site to a new repo and, just like that, you’re done.

Render, however, currently lacks the capability for a site owner to do this. One of Render’s techs helpfully offered to handle it for me if I wished, but noted that “it’s not something we often do and technically we don’t support it.”

So that was all she wrote for the site on Render, just a few days into my second run with it. Again—entirely my fault, not Render’s, for my failure to evaluate that particular capability upfront.

Please learn from my bad example and, when you’re evaluating website hosts, make sure you’ve run through all the possible needs you’ll have. If you’re new to having a site, of course, you may not know what those are. But I’m definitely not new to this, so I should’ve known better. Don’t be me.

Oh, and one more thing: if you’re wondering whence the site now originates, I’d say simply: use your browser’s inspector tool and check the headers. Otherwise, this unintentional saga about the “lurch” may stretch to an even more ridiculous number of parts, and I think we all could do without that. I certainly could.


  1. Can’t call it the “dance” because I already ran that term into the ground for another purpose. ↩︎

Other posts

Next: Two, but not terrible

Previous: Goodbye and hello • Part 4